[Extendflash] JSFL: Macromedia Request your Feedback [last call nag]

[Ryan Matsikas]

I'll second that "Ability to include scripts"

being able to do .. include("path/to/script.jsfl"); would be killer

On 11/4/05, Dennis O'Brien <DOBrien at leapfrog.com> wrote:
>
> 1. Ability to include external scripts properly.
>
> 2. Complete coverage of all object properties (Flash 8 has a lot of new
> additions, but I'm not sure if it's complete).
>
> 3. Have all elements of the document accessible to the script through the
> DOM without using editItem, exitEditMode, etc.
>
> 4. Update the C-level extensions kit to include the full JS datatypes.
>
> --Dennis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: extendflash-bounces at flashguru.co.uk [mailto:
> extendflash-bounces at flashguru.co.uk] On Behalf Of Tomas van der Haase
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:28 AM
> To: Extending Flash
> Subject: [Extendflash] JSFL: Macromedia Request your Feedback [last call
> nag]
>
> Hello:
>
> Last call:
>
> Please list the top 3 things u would like to do with JSFL which currently
> are not possible, or are possible, just not gracefully.
>
>
> 1.
>
> 2.
>
> 3.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomas van der Haäse
> Sr. QA Engineer,
> Macromedia, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> Extendflash mailing list
> Extendflash at flashguru.co.uk
> http://lists.flashguru.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/extendflash
> _______________________________________________
> Extendflash mailing list
> Extendflash at flashguru.co.uk
> http://lists.flashguru.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/extendflash
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.flashguru.co.uk/pipermail/extendflash/attachments/20051104/069ac8cd/attachment.htm